Nyd Designs

Not Ordinary

The Cork & Bottle

On so many vacuous ‘things that real men should do’ lists a popular requirement is to be a regular at one least one bar. As I sit here on a black tub chair slowly drinking my Pirate Life Double IPA I’m considering that everyone should be a regular at one bar. A penis shouldn’t be required. It has nothing to do with being a ‘real man’ whatever that is.

I’m happy to say I’m fast becoming a regular at a new social den whose name unsurprisingly mirrors the title of this piece. The Cork & Bottle has only been open for a few months and I really want to get behind this place. I’ll endeavour to explain just what it is that I love about it without gushing too much.

The ambience is wonderful. The decor seems to stride eclectic and refined. It’s not so much hipster beard as quirky and I know it. There is an upside down scull imbedded in the roof, three white bird cages swing in the gentle breeze. The chairs are comfy.

The wood floor looks like it’s been here forever. The long bar is confident, its new but it doesn’t try to hide that. They have proper pint glasses. No branding. Quality wine glasses. No branding. The menu covers are quality. They are not branded. Also, the chairs are comfy but I might have mentioned that already?

In Perth I’ve become accustomed to looking over at the beers on tap and cringing. It’s usually a painful row of well-known labels all of them ordinary. There is not one – not one bog standard we serve it because we sold out to the big guy’s beer on the tap at the Cork & Bottle.

The wine list doesn’t disappoint either. It’s just as variable as the beer list. It’s also really impressive that such a small venue has put so many wines on by the glass. I would talk about the scotch list, but to do so would almost certainly result in movement in my trouser area. I have to walk out of here. If I talk about the scotch list, I could probably stand up and dance with myself.

There is a proper kitchen adjacent to the bar. It delivers proper food. So many pubs in Perth deliver pub grub food at five star prices. The Cork & Bottle delivers first rate food at old school pub prices. The Beef and London Porter pie is flavoursome, filling and twelve dollars. 

I could go on and on. Instead I’ll conclude by encouraging you all to head on down to the Cork & Bottle to check the place out for yourselves.

The Australian Solution

Prior to the arrival of European explorers approximately five thousand people inhabited the island of Tasmania. These people were technologically primitive relative to the traditional peoples of mainland Australia. Aboriginal Tasmanians had not developed bone tools or sewing. They could not make their own fire. They did not make barbed spears or perhaps the most iconic of Aboriginal Australian weapons the boomerang. 

Initially only small parties of European’s, which hunted the native seal populations, lived sometimes periodically and sometimes permanently in Tasmania. Whilst there were instances of conflict there were also instances of trading between the European’s and the traditional owners.

From the early 1800’s onward however Tasmania was colonised by British settlers the first of which landed in 1804 and went on to found Hobart. This lead to an increase in conflict between the British colonists and the traditional owners.

In 1828 the Tasmanian Governor decreed that all Aboriginal Tasmanian’s must leave the part of the island settled by the British. To enforce this order, the Governor authorised the creation of teams of convicts lead by policemen which had the authority to immediately kill any Tasmanian Aborigines they encountered in the settled areas.

Soon after a bounty of five pounds was set on dead Aboriginal Tasmanian’s heads or two pounds for their children caught alive. This lead to a new pursuit known as ‘catching blacks’. Predictably this resulted in the rapid decline of the Aboriginal Tasmanian population.

In a further escalation a commission was established to recommend an official policy on the issue. It considered such options as poisoning the Aboriginal Tasmanian’s, selling them into slavery, trapping them or hunting them with dogs. Eventually the commission elected to continue with the existing policy of extermination via roving mounted groups who were rewarded with a bounty.

By 1830 the numbers of Aboriginal Tasmanian’s had dwindled to a couple of hundred. These were eventually rounded up by George Augustus Robinson who was a Christian missionary. Robinson transferred the remaining Aboriginal Tasmanian’s to Flinders island where he attempted to ‘civilize’ them.

History is undecided about Robinson’s motives. Some suggest he was genuinely benevolent, some suggest otherwise. Regardless of Robinson’s intent the Aboriginal Tasmanian’s continued to die although by now it was mostly a result of malnourishment and exposure to the elements. The last Aboriginal Tasmanian, Truganini, died in 1876.

The Tasmanian Genocide is one of our nation’s great disasters. It was very nearly repeated on mainland Australia. In 2006 the Aboriginal Australian population was just 2.5% of Australia’s total population (1). I write this because January 26 was Australia Day. Most Australians celebrate this day as the founding of the country. Many of the traditional owners do not.

I can understand some of the rage of the traditional owners. I can never fully comprehend it however as it hasn’t been done to my ancestors. I can never fully appreciate their pain. I can only try to. Some refer to January 26 as invasion day. Others survival day. It’s also important to recognise that some non- Aboriginal Australians also choose not to celebrate Australia Day.

There have been calls from some people to change the date of Australia day to one which is less offensive to Aboriginal Australians. Such calls are typical of the myriad of meaningless gestures which permeate the debate around our nations obligations to the traditional owners. A mere change of date will not and cannot erase the loss of an entire people or the loss of their land.

A change of date will not return their land to them or make the taking of it from them any less painful. Whilst some Aboriginal Australians will march and chant “always was, always will be Aboriginal land’ the reality is that such statements are absurd. The 98% of the Australian population, who are not Aboriginal Australians, do not view Australia as Aboriginal land.

The uncomfortable reality is that the remaining Aboriginal Australians living in Australia represent a small minority of the Australian population. There are more Australians with Italian heritage. There are more Australians with German heritage. There are more Australians with Chinese heritage. These facts are hurtful to Aboriginal Australians, that does not make them any less accurate.

Whilst the date should remain what can and should change is how Australia day is commemorated. It should embrace the good and bad elements of the past. We should still award the Australian of the year. We should still celebrate our successes. Every celebration should also be balanced however by an apology. Whether that is an apology to Aboriginal Tasmanian’s for the wrongs we did them, the various stolen generations, the victims of our soldier’s poor conduct during war or the many others we have wronged.

By acknowledging those we have wronged in the past opportunities for recondition are created. It’s an approach which promotes inclusive celebrations as opposed to the jingoism which accompanies some of our existing celebrations. Being proud to be Australian doesn’t have to be only about Australia, it can also be about our place in the world.

In the same way that adolescents can sometimes struggle to accept their flaws our relatively young nation struggles to accept ours. Changing the focus of what we do on Australia Day can show the international community that we are no longer a ‘pimply teen’. We can truly evolve into an adult nation and deliver to all of our peoples an Australian solution. This solution will not be and cannot be perfect. It should simply strive to be a little more perfect every year. 

 

(1)   http://www.abs.gov.au/ausstats/abs@.nsf/0/946D4BC28DB92E1BCA25762A001CBF38?opendocument

 

Hardcore

In the last post of the previous year I expressed that this year I’d be interspersing my usual ramblings with pieces about people who are doing helpful or useful things. This is the first of those pieces. I won’t ever be accepting payment for writing these types of pieces. I feel that by accepting payment it provides an immediate conflict of interest and lessens the power of the recommendation.

I’m doing this because I think it’s important that we all encourage those who are doing ‘a good thing’. The best way I can do that is to tell other people about the good thing so that more people can benefit from it. Perhaps even history will remember them? I certainly hope it does for this man.   

I’ve always liked history. It was my strongest subject at school and I studied it at university, although I didn’t finish my degree. I’m not sure what the appeal is. I’m quite a curious individual and I think I enjoy the quest to find out just why the things that happened actually happened. At times this endless curiosity has been a source of frustration for my employers, friends and significant others.

Given how much of a history ‘nerd’ I am it’s surprising it took me so long to discover the wonderful work of Dan Carlin. Carlin comes from a background in journalism with experience in both television and radio.

Disgruntled with the partisan views consistently expressed in mainstream media outlets Carlin was an early adopter of ‘internet radio’ or podcasting as it’s more commonly known. Carlin’s original show entitled ‘Common Sense’ mirrored his earlier work in commercial radio. It’s primarily about politics and world events. Dan has described his approach as “Neoprudentist” a label he uses with his tongue firmly in cheek. He still pumps out a new Common Sense show around every three to four weeks.

After a few years of doing this with strong results he started producing a second podcast entitled Hardcore History. Initially these were thirty or forty minutes long although I think the very first one was just twenty minutes long. Each Hardcore History episode examines an event, period or aspect of history.  

The result is a fascinating account of real world historical events by Dan whose prodigious knowledge of the events is delivered to the listener via wonderfully skilful story telling. It’s like sitting around the fire with the oldest member of the tribe while he regales you with tales of his youth and the tribe’s history.

Further adding to the experience Carlin often brings fresh perspectives to historical events. He draws parallels between what happened thousands of years ago and what might be happening now. He can do this, he says, because he is not a qualified historian and thus is not bound by the restraints that many historians operate under.

A good example of the interesting twists presented by Carlin is the very first Hardcore History entitled Alexander Vs Hitler. In it Dan compares the two figures. He notes they were both mass murderers in their time and both despots. Yet history remembers them very-very differently, why is that?

Now an orthodox historian generally steers clear of such things. Like many of the other social sciences, over time history has gravitated towards discussing facts which can be proven by clear physical evidence. Because of this the offerings of actual historians can often be quite dry and difficult to get through. There are no think pieces.

Carlin’s work on the other hand is mostly think pieces albeit backed up by a massive amount of research on his part. He makes the subject matter interesting and that inspires people to want to know more. To perhaps pick up one of those challenging history books which is harder to get through?

No-one else is doing work like this of such quality. The sheer amount of reading the man must be doing is hard to describe. Some other commentators have suggested that a multi-part series such as the ones on the fall of Rome or the First World War contains as much background work as a thesis. 

The link to Dan Carlin’s website is below (1). Some of the content is long. Some of the content is very long. Remember that you don’t have to listen to the whole thing in one sitting. You can absolutely enjoy the story over a number of sessions. It’s well worth the investment of your time. 

  

(1)   http://www.dancarlin.com/

Not the End

“Now this is not the end. It is not even the beginning of the end. But it is, perhaps, the end of the beginning.” So said Winston Churchill in November 1942. In January 2016 those same words aptly describe the current situation at the AFL. On Tuesday 12 January 2016 WADA found thirty-four players guilty of being injected with the banned substance Thymosin beta-4 during the 2012 season. The full statement can be found here (1).

Essendon’s management initially expressed shock and bemusement at the decision. I’m shocked and bemused that anyone could be shocked or bemused at this decision. I’m shocked and bemused that there are still people willing to excuse the behaviour of the Essendon football club or any of the players found guilty.

Essendon President Lindsay Tanner has described the penalty imposed on the 34 players as manifestly unfair (2). It’s evidence that even now the Essendon football club simply doesn’t understand the obligations of sports professionals and the organisations that employ them.  

It’s quite simple. Players should not ingest illegal substances. Players are responsible for any substances they ingest. There is significant evidence that the players are guilty of ingesting Thymosin beta-4. Enough evidence for WADA to find them guilty. The substance in question was a part of a program at Essendon which all players were expected to be a part of. Sporting organisations should not make illegal substances available to their players.

Just as concerning as Tanners statement is the absurd idea that the AFL has acted appropriately throughout this saga. League Chief Gillon Mclachlan has said that he has no regrets about the case (3). Well Gil, just as a heads up mate, WADA feels differently which is why they appealed.

Specifically, WADA said “If the AFL Tribunal’s decision had prevailed, it would have set a damaging precedent for future non analytical anti-doping cases; and, therefore, been detrimental for anti-doping efforts worldwide.” ASADA also released a statement which claimed that WADA used the same evidence that it presented to the AFL anti-doping tribunal, however "the different outcome represents the proper application of the burden of proof - comfortable satisfaction - as intended by the World Anti-Doping Code". (4)

So Gil, what chances do you think the AFL has of growing the game internationally when their own tribunal so clearly got it wrong on this important issue which you have no regrets over? There have even been some unsubstantiated reports that some people in the AFL have suggested the AFL should not operate along the substance abuse guidelines provided by WADA. This kind of silliness reminds me of what used to come out of former Soviet Republics attempting to defend their ludicrous swimming/gymnastic/weightlifting programs.

Perhaps speak to Australian athletes in other fields on this issue. There is a total lack of sympathy for the players and the administration and rightly so.

Grow.

Up.

Gillon.

Just to cap it all off Mclachlan’s official statement ends with this. “It is our understanding that this is now the conclusion to this matter, after some three years, although limited appeal rights do exist through the Federal Court of Switzerland in some instances.”(5). Wrong again Gil. It’s not the end, just the beginning of it.

 (1)   http://www.tas-cas.org/fileadmin/user_upload/Arbitral_Award_WADA_ESSENDON.pdf

 (2)   http://www.essendonfc.com.au/news/2016-01-12/lindsay-tanner-statement

 (3)   http://www.katherinetimes.com.au/story/3660083/afl-has-no-regrets-over-its-handling-of-drugs-case/?cs=2452

 (4)   http://www.foxsports.com.au/afl/essendon-drugs-saga-players-only-have-themselves-to-blame-says-asada-chief/story-e6frf3e3-1227705604354

 (5)   http://www.zerohanger.com/full-statements-from-gillon-mclachlan-and-mike-fitzpatrick-3373/#0HFexV8CZml08qOB.97